NASA Posiblemente Borra Imágenes Sospechosas de OVNIS

En varias ocasiones la agencia federal NASA (o alguien al interior que obedecería directivas no conocidas por el público) parece estar cortando la señal o información de su video feed (video alimentación) en sus recientes experimentos de observación de la Tierra en Alta Definición. El 25 de junio 2015 algo aparentemente anómalo apareció en imagen y la agencia rápidamente cortó la señal poniendo el mensaje que o tenían dificultades técnicas o estaban cambiando las cámaras. Esto también sucedió en enero de 2015.

Según el Catholic On Line, TECH Times, el UK Mirror lo mismo sucedió en junio y agosto de 2014. El Sunday Express también reportó el incidente de junio 29.

Queda la sospecha fundada que posiblemente alguien está secretamente encargado de llevar acabo directivas de agencias de seguridad a pesar de su declarada insistencia pública que son transparentes y que todos los objetos pueden ser explicados convencionalmente de forma lógica. Hay que tener paciencia porque aunque en el video colocado en You Tube se observan momentos de objetos anómalos y el corte pero las imágenes no son muy claras. Luego hacen un acercamiento a la filmación. El objeto o los objetos podrían tener varios orígenes y no solo ‘extraterrestre’ pero interesantemente la situación parece haber sido igualmente censurada…una vez más poco después como un protocolo de respuesta de forma casi automática.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wySFvmvr6Mg

En el siguiente memo de 1991 (ver primer párrafo en la página 7) obtenido por el Proyecto Revelación o Disclosure Project se habla de una relación estrecha entre la CIA y los medios de comunicación.http://disclosureproject.org/docs/pdf/CIAMemo.pdf

En un memo anterior de 1952 de la CIA respecto a reportes recibidos en el Air Technical Intelligence Command (Comando de Inteligencia Técnica Aérea) se es más explícito acerca de la supervisión respecto a temas que en ese momento se definían como pertenecientes al de los “platos voladores”. En este memorandum de Edward Tauss (el memo Tauss) explícitamente se afirma que no se descarta la posibilidad de presencia extraterrestre interplanetaria en el porcentaje de casos (unos 100 entre 2000 reportes) que permanecen “sin explicar” (Si consideramos la tendencia a tratar de descartar casos quizás el porcentaje sería mayor). Bueno, en el memo se dice que se debe supervisar la situación coordinando con autoridades de inteligencia de la fuerza aérea. También se urge a que el público no se percate de ninguna señal de interés de parte de la CIA sobre este tema para que no lo tomen como una confirmación.

Link: https://drive.google.com/…/0B9Ha0yLRWqIJUjRSOGFMaExSTkk/view

Los documentos demuestran el el tema OVNI fue de interés oficial. Además existen muchísimos más documentos de ese tipo. ¿Cómo podría haber dejado de ser algo de interés en años recientes o después que clausuraran el Proyecto Libro Azul? Quizás aun es de tan gran interés que oficialmente insisten en negar pública y mundialmente que tengan mayor interés en el tema pero actividades como esos sospechosos cortes del video feed dan evidencias que el interés obviamente sigue pero oculto detrás de muchos más velos.

UAP Research: The Scientific Challenge

Bogadinski, Kazakhstan, Abril 27, 1995

Bogadinski, Kazakhastan, 1995

I think that ideally (in principle) scientific findings ultimately don’t require general agreement to sufficiently consider in a serious ‘scientific’ manner that something (like the extraterrestrial hypothesis or ETH) has been sufficiently proven. It does not have to be universally accepted as ‘proof’. Even if we are not talking about absolutes here, basically, a few scientists can be correct in recognizing the greater validity of an hypothesis while a majority can be (for instance for sociological, political, and psychological reasons) mistaken in rejecting the valid hypothesis and the whole range of its associated favorable evidence as has occurred many times in the history of science. We often try to fit data to theory when the contrary should also occur and be favored.

In essence, the explanation or theory (considering all possibilities) has to fit the facts and predict behavior instead of the facts having to fit the explanation or theory even if today from a constructivist and general postmodern view vastly influencing the way academia functions (the partially correct postmodern view should be overcome by another ‘post postmodern’ view as ACADEMIC thinking evolves), extensive social AGREEMENT, (politically established as the majority view with which major modern institutions operate with legitimacy) is considered as defining. However, from an ideal, modern, scientific perspective, ultimately-speaking to seeking the best explanations explaining data, facts and empirical experience, general agreement is not what defines scientific validity. Unfortunately, even after 100 years + of quantum mechanics ‘deconstructing’ the idea of a thoroughly independent material, mechanistic reality modern institutions still operate under pre-quantum and Eurocentric paradigms.

That some scientists accept that the ETH has been sufficiently proven after carefully considering different kinds of evidence (that may include forms of interaction) besides what classical nuts & bolts ufological approaches place as limits can also be scientifically correct. The same logic applies to different phenomena that were previously rejected in the history of science because they didn’t fit with generally accepted theory. The so called “fringe” was correct and is not widely embraced. Can we do things differently now after being constantly ‘teased’ by the UAP phenomenon for 70 years or so?

While I seriously applaud when representative institutions offer good examples of interest and research to the otherwise slumbering political, cultural and academic world and world society in general; examples of serious, long-lasting and well conducted research efforts into the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and while I applaud that the ETH (extraterrestrial hypothesis) is at least accepted as a valid, reasonable, rational HYPOTHESIS applicable for SOME UAP cases (as also happens WITHIN the French GEIPAN), I also think that institution-based or independent serious researchers called forth to use a scientific approach also have to evolve a more comprehensive view. If the ETH is acceptable why not try to find more evidence to test it? If the ETH is acceptable why not try to find more evidence to test it as a regular scientific hypothesis? Why not expand methodology to try to do this?

We are almost at a threshold of recognizing a more useful (but also scientific) approach not limited to conventional data-gathering and analyzing of conventional objects after-the-fact, as scientific ufology under the conventional, materialist paradigm imposed while distancing (for credibility’s sake) from what other non-officially-sanctioned researchers may have also found in a careful, objective, scientific manner, (for example in terms of abductions, or alleged contacteeism producing live phenomena that can be filmed, or the role of non-local, mental information-gathering, synchronicities and high strangeness phenomena indicating non-local physical processes, space-time distortions time dilation and retrocausality  that appear to interact with mind and-or consciousness). All of that complexity  (including the subjective and intersubjective) would also now relate to serious UAP research beyond conventional, mechanistic, “nuts & bolts” approaches (in spite of a majority of current offhand, politically correct but ultimately irrational academic biases to the contrary).

We know that – Joseph Allen Hynek and Jacques Vallee became more open about the psychic, high strangeness, psychologically interactive aspects as they researched a great number of cases over the years. They (as many other researchers taking the time to delve into many aspects of the UAP over a long time) found out that a classic scientific approach would be insufficient.

I think that researchers in general should attempt a more wide-ranging, proactive and integrative research while also maintaining a scientific, critical-thinking approach. That is the challenge and promise of the UAP for the greater good: An offer to expand our worldviews and mindsets. Simultaneous greater inclusivity and balance is the key and for that we also need a more comprehensive meta theoretical structure in which the inextricable objective and subjective aspects of nature and experience work together producing a whole new range of objectively detectable phenomena with non-classical characteristics. Emphasizing an aspect over the other maintains us in a dichotomous, “either-or” mindset unable to understand.  While I seriously defend the analytical use of objective detection, scientific measurement and analysis, expert opinion academic consultations, interviews and critical thinking, I disagree with excessive-dismissiveness placed on trying to fit all of the phenomenon to classic pre-conceived scientific biases. On the other hand, I also dislike excesses in credulity and speculation and jumping to conclusions as this detracts from serious academic and political recognition of the UAP. There must be a middle ground: More comprehensive, but balanced…an integrative middle ground.

The UAP data should speak for itself even if science needs to expand and be associated with the more mental, subjective and parapsychological aspects inevitably accompanying the UAP from the start, suggesting the need for a more intimate kind of ‘holistic’ subjective-intersubjective interaction with the appreciable objective-interobjective phenomenon. All aspects of reality would have to be included with an integral (still ‘scientific’) approach. Both excess credulity and excess skepticism fracture and subdivide a phenomenon calling for a different response and unnecessarily divide researchers that have gathered data on valid ‘pieces of the puzzle’ into mutually dismissive camps. Moreover, especially in terms of the puzzling UAP there is a genuine place for informed and creative speculation as there generally is in science, especially when scientific premises are also tentative and constantly evolving!

In fact, when I speak of “ETH” it is more a simplification of what I conser to be the transdimensional origins of this likely presence. Extraterrestrial? Yes in a simple sense. But also from another reality? Yes. Is it physical? Yes, but but necessarily from our know phyical universe. Why transdimensional? Because it apparently uses consciousness and a non-local, non-physical information realm subjacent to physical universes in order to transfer between physical universes.

Yes, concluding that there is indeed something real and unique happening is crucial but moving beyond the stage of simply recognizing this (to culturally mature beyond traditional fragmented thinking and even understand if our independence and safety is truly compromised or not) would require pushing the boundaries of current scientific understanding and procedures. We need to dare and really try to advance a different approach in order to be more prepared if enough evidence (from the UAP itself, government, academics, private researchers and-or civilians) finally comes about for the ETH to be officially acknowledged as verified in a widely credible way becoming universally accepted in a sufficient manner along with its vast implications.

Let’s rise to the challenge!!!

Hacia una Super Ciencia y Meta Filosofía

Hacia una Super Ciencia y Meta Filosofía

por Giorgio Piacenza

Según Archie J. Bahm: “Para el organicismo cada una de las otras 8 teorías expresa una verdad fundamental en sus aserciones positivas, pero cada una de ellas es inadecuada en cuanto a que sus aserciones negativas niegan verdades fundamentales encarnadas en las afirmaciones positivas de las otras.  Esto es, el espiritualismo esta en lo correcto al afirmar que el espíritu existe pero errado en negar que la materia existe. El materialismo esta en lo correcto en creer que la materia existe pero incorrecto en afirmar que el espíritu no existe. El emanacionismo está en lo correcto al afirmar que la materia depende del espíritu pero errado al afirmar que el espíritu no depende de la materia. El emergentismo es verdadero cuando afirma que el espíritu depende de la materia pero falso en presuponer que la materia puede ser completamente independiente del espíritu. Los vedantistas y monistas neutros verdaderamente afirman que el espíritu y la materia son aspectos de algo subyacente a ambos pero falsamente niegan que el espíritu y la materia carezcan de alguna independencia. Los dualistas y creacionistas correctamente afirman que el espíritu y la materia ambos existen más o menos de manera independiente pero se equivocan en la medida que pretenden que la una completa independencia de la materia y el espíritu en relación mutua y de algo que los subyace a ambos. Entonces el organicismo se opone a cada una de las otras teorías al rechazar sus declaraciones negativas pero asume para sí las afirmaciones positivas de cada una de ellas”.(Archie, J. Bahm (1996): Organicism: Origin and Development: World Books.

 

Bahm menciona que:

 

“El organicismo afirma que cualquier totalidad tomada como la más completa también funciona de otras formas como parte de una totalidad superior.  Solo al admitir que ningún nivel es el máximo o mínimo permitido puede el organicismo mantener su fe en la interdependencia constante de la unidad y la pluralidad, lo total y lo parcial, el espíritu y la materia. Ya que el organicismo acepta el cambio como la máxima característica de la existencia ve a toda totalidad, incluyendo al universo, como cambiante cada vez que hay cambio en sus partes. Los todos cambian parcialmente en todos con partes diferentes. En cuanto a que son todos con las mismas partes son los mismos todos pero en cuanto a que son todos con distintas partes son distintos todos”.

 

“La relación de identidad – la más interna de todas las relaciones – es parcialmente externa ya que cada relación posee dos fines que al ser distintos son externos uno respecto al otro”. Para el organicismo cada relación tiene aspectos internos y externos puesto que cada relación tanto separa sus términos una respecto al otro como los une uno respecto al otro.

 

“Inclusive la relación de negación que es la más externa de las relaciones, es parcialmente interna ya que dos cosas no pueden ser su negación mutua sin ser dependientes entre sí para tal negación”. 

 

“Una tesis organicista es que la existencia TAL COMO SE EXPERIMENTA presenta sus condiciones esenciales aparentes como opuestos polares y que cada vez que tales polaridades aparecen, NUEVE tipos de explicaciones teóricas se desarrollan”. 

 

En cuanto a los polos  “Para el organicismo ambos polos existen y aquello que es polar existe interdependientemente, esto es, parcialmente independiente y parcialmente dependiente de su polo opuesto. Y aquello que es polar es parcialmente independiente y parcialmente dependiente de sus polos. Aquello que es polar no puede ser reducido a uno o a ambos de sus polos sea en su totalidad o parcialmente. Un polo no puede ser reducido a su opuesto ni a aquello que es polar de forma parcial o total”.

 

Bahm nos indica que “El organicismo es definido en términos de sus relaciones a las otras 8 teorías (metafísicas). Es dependiente (idéntica con sus afirmaciones positivas) e independiente de ellas (distintas a ellas en cuanto que niega sus afirmaciones negativas). Pretende ser una nueva síntesis debido a la manera como se relaciona con estas 8 teorías y nueva debido a la forma original en que niega sus negaciones lo que resulta en una nueva forma de relacionarse y en una nueva técnica operacional respecto a cómo llega a soluciones de problemas metafísicos y de otros asuntos filosóficos”.

 

————————————————————————————————————–

 

Comentario por Giorgio Piacenza:

 

Hay que observar que en un diagrama de Bahm del organicismo respecto a 8 metafísicas fundamentales en el eje vertical en los extremos el vedantismo se opone a dualismo y en posiciones menos extremas cerca al centro el monismo neutral se opone a creacionismo (en la versión de Boodin que debe ser explicada mejor puesto que no coincide con el creacionismo ex nihilo clásico y en el cual las energías creativas de Dios involucran a un Dios que evoluciona junto a la creación). En el eje horizontal en los extremos el espiritualismo se opone al materialismo y en posiciones menos extremas cerca al centro emanacionismo se opone a emergentismo. El organicismo es el punto central.    Por un lado estimo que el organicismo sería muy útil para demostrar que es innecesaria la pugna que existe en el mundo para afirmar y defender una posición metafísica e ideologías derivadas que luchan una en contra de otra. Todas coexisten bajo el entendimiento organicista y el entendimiento organicista supervive no por sí mismo sino gracias a una comprensión superior.

 

Mientras que conceptualmente el organicismo armoniza las posiciones metafísicas relacionándolas entre sí de forma coherente no logra incluir al creacionismo ex nihilo (que Dios no necesitó de substancia alguna para crear). Por eso en el Organicismo no hay un reconocimiento de lo trascendental al organismo cósmico ni halla si realmente alguna de las ocho posiciones metafísicas realmente corresponde a explicaciones fuera de la realidad cósmica. Compatibiliza supuestos irreconciliables bajo una lógica relacional más completa pero los mantiene supeditados al cosmos aunque este sea mucho más dinámico intuyendo su conexión con una Vida que lo trasciende.

 

Creo que aunque el organicismo de Bahm supera las relaciones dicotómicas de la lógica clásica y es un avance filosófico importante (incluye y trasciende las relaciones opuestas con el medio excluido sin que este tipo de relaciones dejen de ser necesarias) permanece en la dualidad llegándose a entender el cosmos como un organismo autosuficiente bajo tensiones polares dinámicas.

 

Creo que solo al final de su vida, al descubrir que parte del símbolo del Yin/Yang (era profesor de religiones comparadas) también representa la inmanencia mutua, Bahm comenzó a entender una lógica más profunda a la suya y más cercana a la No Dualidad…lo exterior va desapareciendo por la primacía del no objeto. Esta lógica se asemejaría a la de Nagarjuna. Esta sería una lógica que trasciende e incluye a la amplia lógica relacional (las múltiples formas en que lógicamente se pueden relacionar polaridades) usada por Bahm. En última instancia al preguntarnos ¿qué es real? hasta las relaciones mutuas de negación y complementariedad exploradas por Bahm entre las 8 metafísicas serían insuficientes y pasaríamos a una lógica de la negación como la de Nagarjuna que muestra que nada se puede afirmar conceptualmente respecto a la “realidad” apuntando a que en su verdadera “esencia” se halla el Sunyatta que correspondería al Absoluto. Bahm solo halla que una afirmación fundamental puede ser tan válida y necesaria como la otra.

 

En última instancia el Absoluto estaría fuera de las tres lógicas principales (todas derivadas del mismo principio de Identidad-Ser) y de los límites de la conceptualización.

 

Sin la No Dualidad no se podría realmente integrar las esencias de las 8 metafísicas a las que se refiere Bahm. En el organicismo cada metafísica se hallaría en relación dinámica con sus opuestos y con todas las demás y esta relación dinámica, viva, “orgánica” constituiría al “organicismo” pero todo el conjunto de afirmaciones mutuamente necesarias también serían mutuamente contingentes. Para Bahm la estructura se podía sostener por sí misma. Es una perspectiva dual DESDE la EXPERIENCIA; no desde la trascendencia. Estimo que la complementariedad de afirmaciones metafísicas radicalmente opuestas como  aquellas entre el Vedanta y el Dualismo y entre el Espiritualismo y el Materialismo surge en última instancia (parecido al pensamiento de Cusa) de la No Dualidad.

 

Según Fritjoff Schuon, aquello que es “Toda Posibilidad” incluye la posibilidad de su propia negación. De lo No Dual (Dios, Parabrahman, Ser Absoluto) surge la falsa distinción “no Dios, no Ser”, ilusión necesaria para crear seres como apariencias de independencia que en Realidad nunca dejan el seno del Ser Absoluto. Sin embargo, como el ser que incluye a todas las posibilidades puede otorgar una pseudo realidad inclusive a la aparente negación de sí mismo (demostrada por un Parménides bien entendido que es imposible), los seres que podrían decirse creados-emanados, y/o efusionados pueden elegir vivir bajo esa ilusión.

 

Decir que son seres creados es válido así como decir que son seres emanados. Hablar de una “efusión” que no limita en lo más mínimo al Ser Supremo también es válido. Decir unicidad absoluta es válido así como lo es mencionar los derivados de esa unicidad que finalmente se conjugan en la no contradicción de la Identidad Absoluta.

 

Tal como en la sabiduría cabalista del rabino Isaac Luria el Supremo retira algo de su plenum de presencia para crear un espacio en el que los seres contingentes pueden llegar a existir independientemente (pero en realidad de manera aparente y relativa), en este esquema surgiría algo compatible con esa propuesta: surge el “es-no es” (el Ser-no ser) y esta dualidad (origen de la creación y emanación que serían compatibles) implica a cuatro aspectos esenciales que se combinan: Lo indivisible, lo plural, lo propio o interior al Ser y lo ajeno, objetivo o exterior al Ser.

 

A estos 4 aspectos Wilber los llama  lo “Individual” (que no se puede dividir), “Colectivo” (correspondería a lo dual), “Interior” y  “Exterior”. Todo holon o “todo-parte” expresaría ontológicamente y (de forma inextricablemente epistemológica a  estos 4 aspectos pero combinados (en áreas de existencia o expresión y de experiencia). Cada uno de estos 4 aspectos manifestarían holones (partes-todo que constituyen la realidad dual) que principalmente los expresan. Por otro lado los extremos de las posiciones metafísicas que Archie J. Bahm menciona (Vedanta-Dualismo y Espiritualismo-Materialismo) coinciden con los cuatro aspectos (lo indivisible o individual- lo Colectivo o plural y lo Interior-Exterior) de Wilber. La coincidencia entre Bahm y Wilber apunta a una filosofía fundamental, integradora, útil para trascender la crítica posmoderna excesiva.

 

Combinando los 4 aspectos tenemos 4 áreas ontológicas y simultáneamente interpretativas de la realidad experiencial o dual. Todo holón las contendría simultáneamente y también expresaría más un área en particular. Estas 4 áreas son: lo individual-interior (experiencia subjetiva); lo individual-exterior (objetos individuales); lo colectivo-interior (la cultural, la intersubjetividad); lo colectivo-exterior (sistemas).

 

Estimo que lo No Dual manifiesta una Trinidad Fundamental (luego del Ser-no ser o dualidad se añadiría la relación entre ellos). Esta Trinidad Fundamental generaría a tres lógicas fundamentales y a tres planos o formas de existencia fundamentales en lo que podríamos llamar el “Multiverso Multidimensional”. Estos tres planos (con un número probablemente indefinido de subdivisiones) serían el plano físico, el mental y el causal o el plano “principial” de las “semillas”). Por eso la calificación de “Multiverso Multidimensional” trascendería e incluiría no solo a espacios físicos hiperdimensionales, incluyendo a tipos de dimensiones no espaciales como parámetros básicos para la manifestación y experiencia de los planos mentales y causales.

 

Cada lógica predominaría en uno de los tres planos pero todas estarían relacionadas. Asimismo habrían tres formas de causalidad relacionadas y cada una sería dominante en cada una de las tres expresiones trinitarias operando bajo las tres lógicas expresadas en la dualidad y cada forma de causalidad cual dominaría en uno de los tres planos fundamentales de existencia y experiencia.

 

Estimo que los valores platónicos del Bien, la Verdad y la Belleza son expresiones de esta Trinidad Fundamental, así como (en la existencia y experiencia dual) se dan los aspectos subjetivos, intersubjetivos y  objetivos. Asimismo la Primera, Segunda y Tercera personas de la Trinidad Cristiana son esta misma Trinidad en un nivel ontológico y epistemológico metafísicamente localizado entre la No Dualidad absoluta y los tres planos de manifestación duales.

 

El “Padre” de la Trinidad Fundamental puede entenderse bajo el aspecto del Absoluto pero también como un Dios-persona o personal (theos). Ambos no están en contraposición y la Trinidad Fundamental derivaría del Absoluto. El Absoluto incluiría a toda posibilidad de ser, incluyendo al mal o la posibilidad de negar (desde un plano relativo) al Absoluto. El Dios-persona o Padre creador (que crea a través del Logos y nos unifica, conforta, interviene y reconcilia inmanentemente a través del Espíritu Santo) no puede desligarse del “mal” que se halla en su aspecto como Absoluto. Sí puede sugerir, permitir el libre albedrío e intervenir eliminando algún mal en particular sin evadir la necesidad de la existencia relativa del mal en sí mismo.

 

Las formas de causalidad, las lógicas, los planos de existencia y experiencia derivados de la Trinidad Fundamental serían distintos entre sí permitiendo la interacción y una ciencia objetiva entre las realidades. También se hallarían en una relación de necesidad mutua y finalmente en una relación de inmanencia mutua por la cual todo ente como cosa objetiva definible no se podría auto sostener ni por sí mismo ni en relación a otros entes objetivos definibles. Solo derivaría su aparente existencia del hecho de vivir interiormente en otros entes que a la vez existen no por sus relaciones exteriores sino por sus relaciones interiores. Así, en última instancia se sostendría el plano Causal o de Principios donde la causalidad y la existencia y experiencia interior rige sobre la exterior que es ilusoria.

 

Finalmente en un sentido metafísico “superior” más allá del plano Causal (diríamos que incluyéndolo y trascendiéndolo (Panenteísticamente) solo el Ser Puro, Acto Puro, sin la ilusión de lo objetivo u exterior permanece, más allá del devenir y no devenir.

 

El interior del plano Físico (como su proceso autopoiético) estaría causalmente ligado al exterior del plano Mental. El interior del plano mental estaría causalmente ligado al exterior del plano Causal y el interior del plano Causal dependería y “sería” (metafóricamente hablando) el “plano” No Dual. En otras palabras el interior Causal sería la presencia espiritual de Dios en todos los planos.

 

Los tres planos de existencia podrían ser percibidos bajo “los tres ojos” a los que se refiere san Buenaventura (los tres manifiestos dentro de la dualidad). Estos son el “ojo” de la carne o de lo físico, el “ojo” de lo mental y el “ojo” del espíritu cada uno constituyendo un medio para interactuar con el plano correspondiente (el plano físico, el mental y el causal-o “espiritual” pero bajo la dualidad) de forma más directa. Sin embargo, mientras cada “ojo” percibiría directamente los aspectos exteriores u objetivos de cada plano de existencia relativa, los tres ojos estarían entremezclados también siguiendo los preceptos de las tres lógicas fundamentales (distinción, relación, dependencia interior mutua). Por eso encarnados en el plano físico, mientras percibimos los objetos físicos a través del ojo de la carne también podemos percibir objetos mentales y principios causales. Asimismo, aunque un “ojo” en particular predomina para la percepción de objetos exteriores correspondientes a cada plano (el ojo de la razón en el plano mental y el ojo del espíritu en el plano causal), los tres “ojos” también nos sirven simultáneamente en los otros dos planos.

 

Al entender cómo las tres lógicas, los tres planos y las tres causalidades son todas necesarias (interactivas, relacionantes y mutuamente dependientes en relación inmanente) la humanidad podría madurar hacia una ciencia mucho más amplia que la limitada al plano físico incluyendo pero trascendiendo lo que proporcionan los métodos principalmente desarrollados para el plano físico usando una lógica aristotélica. Nos acercaríamos a manifestar capacidades creativas primero utilizando el poder de los patrones mentales y de información y luego los axiomas y principios subyacentes a estos patrones mentales y de información. Nos acercaríamos a una “Meta Ciencia” integrativa quizás propia de algunas o muchas civilizaciones extraterrestres más avanzadas capaces no solo de manipular el espacio-tiempo (o espacio-tiempos) sino de crear efectos aún más profundos en cuanto al manejo de la “realidad” (o realidades) a través del manejo de patrones de información y sus principios subyacentes. Esta “Meta Ciencia” incluiría los aspectos cualitativos y cuantitativos relacionados a lo que Ken Wilber reconoce como lo individual, lo plural, lo interior y lo exterior.

 

Respecto a la No Dualidad explicada podemos exaltar la unicidad pero también tres expresiones que pueden depender de la misma sin caer en contradicciones. No es realmente necesario el conflicto entre religiones. Cuando tratamos de entender al Absoluto con mucho cuidado bajo categorías mentales, estas coinciden o se empiezan a parecer:

 

Padre, Hijo, Espirítu Santo en cristianismo. Ain, Ain Sof, Ain Sof Aur en la cábala hebrea. Ananda, Chid y Sat en Vedanta. En Budismo correspondientes a los cuerpos búdicos: Darmakaya (cuerpo de la verdad), Sambogakaya (cuerpo de la relación) y Nirmanakaya (cuerpo del universo concreto). Finalmente en misticismo Islámico podría haber una relación con los conceptos Tawhid (unicidad), Wujud (ser) y Wajd (éxtasis) todos contenidos y trascendidos en “Al-lah” que además es el Absoluto ilustrado con los conceptos de al-Dhat al-ilahiyyah(la esencia divina más allá del ser y no ser relativos) y dewahdat al-wujood (solo Dios es el verdadero Ser).

 

Dios en sí puede expresarse (y/o lo podemos entender como seres contingentes inmersos en experiencias duales) en primera, segunda y tercera personas: El Dios “Padre” que es la verdadera esencia en la que vivimos y que experimentamos místicamente en primera persona tal como principalmente se experimenta la Belleza y la dicha divina (el “Ananda” del Saguna Brahman  o Dios “con cualidades” o con las mínimas calificaciones para una inteligibilidad) tenemos al Dios “Logos” o a aquel Otro Sagrado, Inteligente y Amoroso, Prisma a través del cual todo es creado y que reconocemos inteligiblemente en segunda persona en relación a la “Verdad” y al “conocimiento de” (el “Chid” o conciencia como conocimiento del Saguna Brahman con el cual (y también vinculados al “Padre”) establecemos una relación en tercera persona o un “nosotros”. Este “nosotros” en sí es el ser divino pero manifiesto como relativo (el “Sat” del Saguna Brahman) y se constituye como la presencia inmanente de Dios como “Espíritu Santo” vinculándonos al Logos y al Padre mientras permanecemos en la creación.

 

Por lo menos desde nuestro punto de vista humano-dependiente-finito podría decirse (siempre imperfectamente y en un sentido Tomista) que el Absoluto es interioridad pura sin distinciones, sin exteriores, sin múltiples divisiones. En ese sentido es en sí mismo  “Acto Puro” y lo verdaderamente existente y para los seres contingentes y el mundo (o Multiverso Multidimensional) es posibilidad de ser o potencialidad.  El Absoluto en sí mismo sería la actualización infinita de nuestro potencial y para el Absoluto nosotros y el mundo serían el potencial de ser lo cual sería equivalente a la negación de lo que ya en el Absoluto es.

 

Desde una perspectiva contingente la materia (y gradaciones de mundos intermedios entre el absoluto y el extremo material) es actual y el Absoluto es potencial pero desde una perspectiva absoluta lo absoluto es actual y la materia y mundos intermedios son potenciales. Estos últimos son la aparente/ilusoria negación de lo que verdaderamente es.

 

La relación entre este modo de pensar místico-teológico y otras filosofías místicas y esotéricas es obvia. Incluso el budismo que superficialmente puede entenderse como rechazando la posibilidad de Dios puede ser completamente compatible con la idea del Absoluto y este caso lo hallamos específicamente personificado en la poco conocida escuela budista Maha Madhyamika que enfatiza que todo puede considerarse vacío excepto la talidad o esencia misma que no puede prescindir de sí misma.

 

Seguimos la conversación,

Giorgio Piacenza

 

What is EXOPOLITICS?

In simple terms, I’ll say that EXOPOLITICS is the field of research and political activism dealing with the cultural and practical implications of an extraterrestrial presence.

While serious evidence exists regarding a complex, interacting, intelligent extraterrestrial presence, it is not absolutely necessary to believe in this, but it is minimally necessary to consider the implications of this possibility either in the past, the present or the future.

Exopolitics: Definitions by Outstanding Researchers

Michael E. Salla PhD: Exopolitics is the formal discipline that studies the implications of extraterrestrial life in relation to public policies. It is the study of the key individuals (actors), institutions and political processes associated with extraterrestrial life. Dr. Salla’s style tends to be more academic but operating under an extensive conceptual range. http://exopolitics.org/about/founder/

Relying on decades of diverse accumulated evidence with assigned degrees of credibility, at the Exopolitics Institute founded by Dr. Salla, the extraterrestrial presence is already considered to be a concrete reality of immense cultural, legal, political, religious and scientific interest for humanity.

Alfred L. Webre JD: Exopolitics is the study of political processes and governance in inter stellar community. Dr. Webre –a Canadian- coined and-or popularized the term “exopolitics.” On my account, Webre’s style is more “interpersonal” as he values more personal evaluations based on interviews. He may be correct regarding some less verifiable aspects but probably also tend to fall into some exaggerations. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/about.html

I think that Dr. Webre and Dr. Salla’s definitions complement each other.

Stephen Bassett: Exopolitics is the art or science of government as concerned with guiding or influencing governmental policy toward extraterrestrial-related phenomena and extraterrestrial beings.  Mr. Bassett also refers to “exopolitics” as “exopolitical actions, practices, or policies” as “the exopolitical opinions or sympathies of a person” and as “the total complex of relations between the human race and non-human, intelligent beings.”

Stephen Bassett (who organized public audiences for the disclosure of the extraterrestrial cover-up at the National Press Club in Washington, DC) focuses more on political activism, especially vying for the great world powers in the know to reveal to their citizens and to the world what is what they really know and secretly research about the extraterrestrial presence. http://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/

Ed Komarek: Exopolitics is the study of politics pertaining to extraterrestrial contact.

According to Mr. Komarek “Exopolitics is based upon the understanding that earth is being visited by many advanced extraterrestrial races with diverse ethics, motives and agendas. http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/

Paola Harris: Exopolitics is the convergence of an interdisciplinary science, a political movement and a new paradigm which relate to the vast range of implications regarding extraterrestrial life. Exopolitics also is the study of the contacts and relationships between humanity and extraterrestrial civilizations. http://www.paolaharris.com

All the previous mutually enhancing definitions and associated exopolitical research aim at understanding the complexity of extraterrestrial life and at developing adequate, mutually beneficial policies.

The development of well-informed, life-enhancing policies about the extraterrestrial presence so as to peacefully and intelligently integrate humanity in a respectful way within a vast cosmic community of intelligent beings is a crucial goal in Exopolitics.

There also is a short and a longer formal definition of Exopolitics worth mentioning because they were developed within Exopolitics Institute as a group consensus process in 2009. The group participants were Michael Salla Victor Viggiani, Manuel Lamiroy, Pepón Jover, Robert Fleischer, Paola Harris, Neil Gould, Come Carpentier.

The FORMAL DEFINITION:

Exopolitics is an interdisciplinary scientific field, with its roots in the political sciences, that focuses on research, education and public policy with regard to the actors, institutions and processes, associated with extraterrestrial life, as well as the wide range of implications this entails through public advocacy and newly emerging paradigms.

The SHORT DEFINITION

Exopolitics is the convergence of a new interdisciplinary science, an international political movement and a new paradigm, which all deal with the wide range of implications of extraterrestrial life.

Please go to this link  http://exopoliticsinstitute.org/?page_id=1043

Further Development of the Concept

Exopolitics has various aspects. It can be understood as a scientific discipline (as an emerging social science) involving research, education and the creation of policies (focusing upon actors, institutions and processes) in order to treat in a coherent way the implications of extraterrestrial life, including an intelligent extraterrestrial presence.

Another aspect of exopolitics refers to a global, multicultural, multinational and-or grassroots social movement with educational purposes advocating to transform the current (scarce, often dismissive and excluding) management of information on extraterrestrial life. It also advocates the creation of new, democratically and publicly sanctioned national and international policies of research, aperture, contact and education.

Furthermore, exopolitics is in agreement with the necessity of broadening and actualizing our metaphysical and scientific concepts about the nature of reality, basing ourselves on more inclusive and new philosophical, methodological, scientific, ethical and spiritual paradigms which can help us understand in a more complete and profound way the nature of possible interactions with a diverse cosmic community which apparently transcends the classical limits of space-time and an excessively simplistic dichotomous way of thinking.

The shifts and additions in “paradigms,” worldviews and in their implicit metaphysics would relate with increases in the capacity of consciousness to take in more perspectives in first, second and third person subjectivity. Open systems theories, autopoiesis and complexity sciences, “exoconsciousness” (or the role of consciousness in cosmological, organizational, and evolutionary processes), holographic theories (like astronaut Edgar Mitchell’s), information-based physics, alternative non-classical technologies, quantum computing, non-standard, coherent interpretations and applications of quantum and quantum-relativistic phenomena, variations on M-Theory, zero-point energy, possible forms of canceling gravity and inertia as well as studies in relation to a physics connecting consciousness, retrocausality, information, multiple realities, geometry, higher dimensionality and even “subtle energies.”

Deeply related to Exopolitics is the field of Exoconsciousness, a concept developed by Mrs. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright andpertaining to the extraterrestrial origins, dimensions and abilities of human consciousness. http://rebeccahardcastlewright.com/about/ The very unfoldment of the Cosmos would also be related in a fundamental way to the expressions of consciousness.

 

Moreover, I think that recognizing the primacy of Consciousness as Non Dual (distinct and prior to subjective consciousness and its simultaneously-arising objective “material” counterparts, processes and mechanisms in multi-tiered levels of “reality”) is crucial not to fall yet into another form of reductionism, however subtle, even if it is based on a post-classical science.

Furthermore, I think that  – in regards to philosophy – it will be important to extend our concepts and practice in a transdisciplinary manner, partially based upon elements of Ken Wilber’s “Integral Theory” (and in other compatible Meta integrative models) which challenge the primacy of a classic materialist realism and-or reductionist materialism contributing to the creation of less dichotomous, more integral and inclusive “paradigms” and rational metaphysical foundations.

Considering the recent developments in Meta Philosophies and or Integrative philosophies (like Basarab Nicolescu’s, Edgar Morin’s, Ken Wilber’s and Roy Bhaskar’s) I think that Exopolitics should advance beyond (or rather transcend and include) interdisciplinarity becoming TRANSDISCIPLINARY as common axioms and principles behind the various disciplines that contribute to this discipline are discovered.

In this manner Exopolitics will resonate more in accord with the philosophical shift bound to modify other disciplines related to the possibility of a profound transformation and reestructuring of civilization (disciplines like Astrobiology, an emergent consiousness and information-based, hyperdimensional physics and even perhaps Ecology, Economy and the Complexity Sciences). I think that discovering how to integrate qualitative and quantitave conceptual structures and methods under shared axioms, patterns and principles will assist humanity in establishing a less dichotomous and more intelligently inclusive dialogue with extraterrestrial civilizations.

Currently, Exopolitics primarily uses the more qualitative methods of the social sciences basically to produce evaluations or assessments (akin to intelligence assessments) about different cultural, political, strategic, legal, interactive and social situations pertaining to an actual or to a possible extraterrestrial presence. It aims at being useful for political decision-making in relation to extraterrestrial life and – as an extension – in relation to space law and the actual use of space. In case of acknowledge the discovery of extraterrestrial life (even if microbial) and in contact with ET intelligences working in conjunction with the United Nations would likely be necessary. Find out about the United Nations’ OOSA at  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0cOFMgKUFw

The legal status of extraterrestrial beings and even of their alleged bases on Earth and rights to traverse the skies of current modern nation-states is also considered.

Whenever possible serious exopoliticians analyze and compare information with (verified or probable) leaked or declassified official documents. The probable motivations behind individuals, institutions and groups are also analyzed. Likewise, probable historical patterns of interaction in what appears to be an ancient human-extraterrestrial relationship are researched and there’s an attempt to elucidate the diverse probable interests and purposes behind policies of cover-up and-or release of information as much as the diverse probable interests and purposes of a variety of extraterrestrial beings.

Also, there’s an attempt to understand which would be the more adequate “paradigms” and rational metaphysical presuppositions needed to constructively assimilate the reality of an interacting extraterrestrial presence. Moreover, there’s an attempt to predict the consequences of a greater degree of publicly recognized contact events with extraterrestrial beings and to educate and (given that representatives from several extraterrestrial civilizations seem to have been continuously interested in establishing various degrees of direct contact with citizens from different countries) promote greater levels of responsible citizen contacts or a responsible “citizen diplomacy” establishing contact protocols based upon the principle of mutual respect.

Although at Exopolitics Institute there’s a provisional overall extraterrestrial typology developed on the basis of observing consistently reported interactive behavior patterns (Helpers, Observers, Manipulators and Intruders),there is also an attempt to study all aspects of these interactions ever more profoundly and to understand how may the cosmic community be organized; a “community” which would probably be interacting with us under norms and principles based on a more inclusive logic.

Mr. Manuel Lamiroy gives a good overview about exopolitics in his web site as follows: http://www.exopaedia.org/Exopolitics  and at http://www.exopoliticssouthafrica.org/exopolitics.htm

He also created a good diagram which at a glance illustrates some of the basic areas of exopolitics. It can be found at http://www.exopoliticssouthafrica.org/exopolitics.htm Lamiroy has been a long-time, integrative researcher who has also published an “Exopaedia” with vast information including some possible extraterrestrial typologies, possible planetary origins and more. The “Exopaedia” can be found at http://www.exopaedia.org/Exopaedia

 

 exopolitics_definition

NUEVOS APORTES EN EL MUNDO MÁGICO DE LA ARQUEOLOGÍA: ¿UN “DESCUBRIMIENTO” A LA INVERSA?

NUEVOS APORTES EN EL MUNDO MÁGICO DE LA ARQUEOLOGÍA:
¿UN “DESCUBRIMIENTO” A LA INVERSA?
EL Instituto Peruano de Pensamiento Complejo Edgar Mori(n (IPCEM) presenta a Pablo Novoa Alvarez. reconocido explorador y arqueólogo, referente en programas televisados como Cuarto Milenio de España y las publicaciones Geomundo de Miami, Revista de Arqueología de Madrid, Misterios de la Arqueología de Madrid, Año Cero . El Sr.. Novoa Álvarez explorador de campo e investigador de PETROGLIFOS desde hace muchas décadas propone la hipótesis que desde los Andes se originó una difusión cultural (hace unos 6,000 años +) que llegó al Caribe, Venezuela, los nativos Arawacos, Islas Canarias, Península Ibérica y quizás tuvieron influencia en parte de algunas culturas en la actual USA (como los Mound Builders de Ohio). Reconoce GRABADOS LINEALES similares en los lugares antes mencionados. Desde hace unos años empieza a explorar el tema de posible influencia extraterrestre en el pasado y de una simbología en ocasiones similar a la taquigrafía.
Fecha 10 de JULIO.
Hora 6:30 PM. Centro Cultural Ccori Wasi
Av. Arequipa Nº 5192, Miraflores.
Entrada gratuita.
Informes +(511) 242-2663

Alcubierre Drive Becoming More Feasible: UFO-Like Technology Is Plausible

warp_drive_starship-300x165

Basic idea depicted of torus ring warping spacetime

There’s work going on at NASA which might be slowly revealing a shift in mendset from conventional action-reaction, Newtonian science and denial of the extraordinary (i.e “classic”) events to a more “exotic,”  yet useful, no-nonsense science perfectly allowed by the known laws of physics. The “Alcubierre Drive” (based on a paper published in 1994 by Miguel Alcubierre) is becoming feasible.  CNN gave the news on 06/18/2014 but advances had been in the works at least officially for a few years.  The news mentioned travelling “faster than the speed of light” which is not quite accurate but, nonetheless, the possibility of developing technology to reach distant locations like Alpha Centauri within months or even two weeks made the news a bit of a pro (ET presence) disclosure, eye-opener.

 

The “Alcubierre Drive” (based on a paper published in 1994 by Miguel Alcubierre) is becoming feasible.  CNN gave the news on 06/18/2014 but advances had been in the works at least officially for a few years.  The news mentioned travelling “faster than the speed of light” which is not quite accurate but, nonetheless, the possibility of developing technology to reach distant locations like Alpha Centauri within months or even two weeks made the news a bit of a pro (ET presence) disclosure and an eye-opener. The chief scientist working on such important interstellar matters for NASA is Dr. Harold “Sonny” White. At http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/team/harold-white/ we read “Dr. White holds a Ph.D. in Physics from Rice University, a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Wichita State University, and a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from University of South Alabama. Dr. White has accumulated over 15 years of experience working in the aerospace industry with Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and NASA.”

 

“Wormholes” and “Warp Drives” come to mind to practically travel great distances in space as allowed by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity. Both involve manipulating the “fabric” of spacetime and both would require an exotic form of energy known as “negative energy” and-or “negative vacuum energy” which – as of today – is conventionally difficult to obtain. “Warp Drives” refer to encapsulating spaceships inside a distorted spacetime “bubble” (warped or distorted in relation to an exterior spacetime reference frame). They’re about expanding spacetime behind the spaceship and contracting it at its front. The vehicle thus encapsulated inside this “bubble” would “surf” or “slide” towards a destiny focused ahead of the contracting front and since there’s is no limit in principle to the amount of space contraction and dilation, it would be able to “surf” at relative speeds many times that of light.

 

More specifically, in relation to the quantum vacuum (which can have different energy densities), two distinct spacetime energy densities derived from that vacuum can move faster than “C” in relation to each other. While inside the altered spacetime “bubble,” the spaceship itself never travels beyond “C” (the speed of light limit in the vacuum), but that spacetime “bubble” in relation to the spacetime frame outside of it can indeed “move” faster than “C” carrying along the vehicle inside toward an otherwise unbearably distant destination. Impractical differences in the passage of time occurring through Lorentzian effects incurred when accelerating close to the speed of light (but within the same spacetime energy density) would also be overcome. After the warp field/“bubble” within which “surfing astronauts” are travelling is turned off, the time passed within it would correspond to the time passed outside. Passengers would return to their original time frame without having incurred Lorentzian time-dilation effects. “Eagleworks Laboratories” is the lab working (within NASA’s Johnson Space Center, in Houston, TX) on this promising development and thus far there seems to have been some success in spite of the small amount of funding given for this project (perhaps in the order of 50,000 USD).

 

However, scientists are working in a laboratory that was also used to develop inertial components for the Apollo Missions and which can be isolated from vibrations outside. They also have access to precision instruments because the measurements they are attempting to make (with small warp field-generating prototypes) are very small. The positive effects apparently obtained as of today are tiny but likely about to be replicated and sufficiently verified as “proof-of-concept,” perhaps thereafter eventually “maturing” into a practical application. Still, much needs to be carefully tested but, apparently, these almost “proof-of-concept” experiments are quite promising.

 

For success in inter stellar travel activities, it seems crucial to produce “negative density/negative pressure,” through a charged negative potential “ring” (or torus) perpendicular to the craft. Capacitors are being used with this toroidal topography (or geometric shape). Good general information can be found in “WARP FIELD MECHANICS 101″ and WARP FIELD MECHANICS 102” by Harold White at: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110015936.pdf and at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130011213.pdf

 

A question: May current toroidal “ring” forms perpendicular to the section containing the spacehip crew eventually evolve into ellipsoidal forms and double disc, classic UFO shapes? If we continue to surround the central “cabin” with thick rings or torii it look like we could form an enclosed ovoid.

 

Antonio Urzi-26-8-08a

Photo by Antonio Urzi from Italy showing concentric “rings” in a disc shape metallic-looking object

The warped bubble of spacetime apparently created inside that negative potential “ring” or torus would be FLAT. Thus the craft inside this “bubble” would experience CERO acceleration and – within its own frame of reference – it wouldn’t in fact go faster than the speed of light. Without feeling/experiencing any acceleration or a challenge to inertia people or objects inside the craft (itself inside the warp or “bubble”) would not crash against the walls. Interestingly Dr. White found (in 2011 and 2012), by making the “ring” (the torus) thicker (like a “life saver” candy) the effects are potentiated; while the flatness of space is decreased (would not be a good thing for crew members) the mechanical ‘strain’ required to manipulate spacetime is decreased; meaning that less negative energy would be needed to achieve the Alcubierre Drive effect. Thus the energy density inside the warp or “bubble” would collapse many orders of magnitude.

 

For a 10 meter diameter craft, by thickening the “ring,” “torus” or “donut shape,” the Jupiter-size mass as energy source once needed can be reduced to, let’s say, the mass the Voyager spacecraft. As shown in the first image perhaps the single torus can be doubled. In a basic presentation found at a Space Vision’s student conference found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKTgNCGhq9Y Dr. White explains that “A series of Barium Titanate ceramic capacitors are charged to very high (DC) voltages to establish a very large potential energy, to establish a blue-shifted frame relative to the lab.

 

The net effect according to the field equations should change the perceived wave length of that leg of the interferometer for a photon as it moves through that (warped) region.” The interference patterns seem to change as a function of time.” Experimenters are trying to find Fourier transform changes. They have detected some interesting but not definitive changes. As of today I’ve found little information about the oscillating charge-discharge frequencies used but suspect that they are a key component also needed to magnify the Alcubierre Drive Effect.

 

Could it be that frequencies that may cancel out and “warp” our 4D regular spacetime (possessing a specific stable energy density framework in the quantum vacuum) would be understood as out of phase multiples of a fundamental spacetime oscillation?

 

With a Helium-Neon laser-based interferometer detecting shifting light interference properties Dr. White and his team are trying to measure a small-scale warp bubble effect to achieve proof-of-concept. The effect to be measured is very tiny (about 1/100 a wave length of light) so it requires much precision and a seismically isolated room and a computer analysis to overcome the signal-to-noise ratio.  Perhaps a larger prototype will show a greater effect. They are also trying to use a Fabry-Perot interferometer to measure it. A spaceship sent to Alpha or Beta Centauri would have to start with a small acceleration in order for its spacetime “bubble” to continue to move forward in relation to the outer frame of reference.

alcubierre2

Travelling inside the warp

The amount of energy required would be a function of the radius. For spacetime to ‘know’ which direction to contract and to expand – if indeed it is “catalytic” – one would need to accelerate with a conventional propulsion system to establish an initial velocity relative to some ecliptic or solar inertial frame. Then turn the field on. Then space expands and contracts as a result , but not itself as a catalyst, contracting up front and expanding behind. The expansion balances with the contraction.

The spaceship would then be carried within the “bubble” in the direction of the contraction and spacetime as a reference frame can move faster than “C” in relation to the spacetime frame exterior to the bubble. We would have an oscillating potential field given by the relation dϕ/dt.

 

I wonder about the most adequate frequencies remains open and if a frequency multiple as a rotating or counter rotating field out of phase with a fundamental 4D spacetime frequency would be useful. Another test approach that is being tried at NASA’s Eagleworks Lab: Instead of placing a ring of potential energy around the beam path they tried to put a very high potential region in the middle of the light beam path.

 

So a capacitor was placed in the middle of the beam path and they apparently got even more interesting results. Another method also explored (the “Q Thrust”) works by pushing off against the quantum vacuum’s virtual particles popping in and out of existence in space.  Where fields are stronger there are more virtual particles popping in and out of existence whereby creating such fields would make such a thrust theoretically plausible. Creating a warped bubble field would also make the “Q Thrust” more feasible. To me this indicates that a series of technologies based on similar principles reinforce each other. The role of the torus is also seen in other interdimensional approaches to the nature of reality.

 

Some questions: As of today I’ve found little information about the oscillating charge-discharge frequencies used but suspect that they are a key component needed to magnify the Alcubierre Drive. Could it be that frequencies that may cancel out and “warp” our 4D regular spacetime (possessing a specific stable energy density framework in the quantum vacuum) would be understood as out of phase resonance-cancelling multiples of a fundamental 4D spacetime oscillation?

 

I wonder if switching the toroidal capacitors on and off with and-or generating a circulating field cycles around them with a specific resonant multiple of a basic quantum vacuum space-time frequency might enhance the effect. I wonder if the appropriate frequency might also relate to a completely out-of-phase resonant multiple of gravity wave frequencies in 4D spacetime?

 

Connections with the Work of Robert L. Schroeder (previously reported in Exonews) Can these recent advances in Alcubierre Warp Drive generation relate to the model (and predictions) being forged by Engineer Robert L. Schroeder? Schroeder’s model (coming from a particle physics perspective) is connected with RS1 Warped Geometry Theory, a variety of String and Brane Theory attempting to explain the weakness of the force of gravity). It explains ET-UFO effects as gravity cancellation effects in relation to Kaluza Klein Gravitons that may exist in a Five Dimensional “Bulk” and which – in turn – may generate micro black holes capable of canceling normal gravitons in our normal 4D spacetime (See: http://exonews.org/worthy-attempt-solve-enigma-extraterrestrial-ufo-propulsion/ ). To me the answer is “yes it might” and this should be studied further. For instance, Dr. White found that expanding the Alcubierre metric into a higher spacetime would change the stiffness of spacetime.

 

Apparently, if the “bubble’s” intensity were also oscillated the stiffness of spacetime would be decreased and this would also reduce the energy requirement.  A minimum, non-trivial amount of negative energy would still be needed to reduce the stiffness of spacetime according to the following basic relation:  dϕ/dt.  However in relation to a higher spacetime frame (like the 5 D “bulk”) a positive vacuum energy density might induce a negative vacuum energy density and warp field. In a paper published by Dr. White and by E. W. Davis titled “The Alcubierre Warp Drive in Higher Dimensional Spacetime” (it can be found at  http://www.earthtech.org/publications/davis_STAIF_conference_2.pdf )we read in the conclusion that there is a “remarkable discovery that a spacecraft’s spacetime expansion boost in the Alcubierre warp spacetime actually represents a movement of the spacecraft off our local brane (3 + 1 dimensional spacetime) and into the higher dimensional bulk space. The Alcubierre warp spacetime expansion boost merely acts as a scalar multiplier acting on an initial velocity. The consequence of this is that the equation of state for the energy density and pressure that induces this effect is equivalent to the dark energy equation of state and the equation of state for the vacuum energy in space. This suggests a conceptual laboratory experiment whereby a toroidal positive energy density induces a negative pressure warp field.”

 

In other words, achieving exotic negative energy effects might be plausible through positive energy manipulation if we indeed live in a higher dimensional, 5D “bulk.” This may also mean that electromagnetic photons emitted by the spaceship while inside the spacetime warp “bubble” might not be detected in the regular 4D (3 space + 1 time) spacetime frame.  The spacecraft would become gradually invisible as it moves off our normal reference frame (or 4D brane) and into the 5D bulk.

 

As we can recognize, many of the unique (beyond Newtonian) characteristics (also listed by Robert L. Schroeder) observed through the best available evidence of what could reasonably be considered as technologically advanced extraterrestrial vehicles seem to be partially explained not only by Dr. Schroeder’s model but by the model being developed at NASA. While NASA uses the so called “Chung-Freese Model” and Schroeder uses Randall-Sundrum’s RS1 Model, both consider that our perceived 4D Universe exists within a more encompassing 5D brane called “the bulk.” I think this two models should be carefully compared, especially if both allow for similar non-classical practical space travel behavior. Perhaps the mathematical differences can be worked out.

 

Interestingly, besides, an annulment of inertial effects, and a way to reach otherwise exceedingly distant locations in 4D spacetime, we may speak of a way to become translucent and even to achieve invisibility. As White and Davis suggest in the aforementioned paper: “As the Alcubierre LIF (ALIF) warps as suggested by equation (7), the photons emitted from it will not be able to intersect the coordinate observer (lab)frame because the photons were emitted off-brane from the ALIF. This is the reverse scenario we discussed earlier where photons on the brane were not able to interact with an electron off of the brane. Unless something acts on the off-brane photons to reduce their boost, they will not be detected by the on-brane coordinate observer. Hence, an Earthbound coordinate observer will most likely see a dimming effect when viewing the ALIF as its spacetime expansion boost increases. Similarly, the ALIF will see his/her surrounding universe grow dimmer and dimmer as photons emitted on-brane cannot reach the now off-brane ALIF.”

 

 In other words, the translucent and invisibility-achieving aspects of UFOs would also be part of the effects predicted by this technology developed at NASA. Moreover, as “proof-of-concept” is finally reached to reasonable satisfaction, overly skeptical scientists (excessively attached to accepting “reality” only in classical terms and unable to conceive that other intelligences may be able to reach Earth from remote locations) will also have to contend with the theoretically canonical and experimentally established idea that some interstellar civilizations may have had enough time and opportunities to develop a form of practical Alcubierre Warp Drive. This and further amounts of high-quality ET-UFO evidence and more scientific advancements will make blatant, closed-minded research extremely untenable.

Once more…will closing up gaps between the torus “rings” make the spaceships resemble some classic UFOs? (below artwork of double ring Alcubierre Drive-based “IXS Enterprise Ringship” by Mark Rademaker followed by a cilindrical-shaped UFO video)

alcubierre drive spaceship with double torus

See video of an alleged cilindrical-shaped UFO over Korosten, Ukraine  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG76xkW5adI

Ghosts & UFOs Both Manipulating Space-Time? What’s in Common?

Physical Interactions with Discarnate Spirits : Toward a More Fundamental Science (part one)

By

Giorgio Piacenza


Different advanced theories and experimental results are leading us to scientifically consider the reality of an important relation with a realm of discarnate spirits, a realm that would be a precursor to our particular physical universe and necessary to complete our understanding of physical reality. According to Dr. Thomas Campbell (author of the TOE model) the phenomenon of “quantum erasure” shows that we live in a “virtual” universe that requires consistency of detected/perceived information. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RMOGFaOLSQ


“Quantum Erasure” demonstrates that, if we do not look at but also destroy the results of measured data for detected particles in a series of the double slit experiments, all the experiment’s results show that only wave-based diffraction or interference patterns remain. This shows that CONSISTENCY is required in our particularly macroscopically coherent quantum universe. Moreover, other interesting theories like that of the “Quantum Hologram” proposed by physicist and astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell would be compatible with the idea of macroscopic scale holographic coherence of quantum waves and that would also agree with the requirement for information consistency. However, if we extend Gödel‘s incompleteness theorems as aplicable to a binary, digital, virtual (even if holographic) universe, a universe only organized under a classical logic useful for first order artihmetic, we will find that that consistency does not entail completeness. 


In other words, the physical universe experienced under classical parameters would have to extend itself in a continuous search for completeness through a continuous creative relation and interaction as a subset of a more inclusive “universe” (in fact a distinct and more primordial realm of being) which can be best understood under a more inclusive logic. That logic would be akin to a “both-and” logic of complementarities. I think that that other “realm” would be a realm in which there’s s “higher symmetry” in the sense that exterior “matter” would be co-causal with particular subjective experience. 


That would be a “Subtle Realm” (a name given in certain mystical traditions) and, while containing our universe (mostly as a potential entity in terms of our ordinary conscious experience), it would be the WHOLE or interconnecting whole containing and organizing (as one of its parts) our particular “lower symmetry,” physical universe in which space-time parameters rule classical macroscopic experience as an inextricable continuum while also posing (in a more fundamental quantum level) limits to measuring our information-gathering both in terms of TIME (momentum) and SPACE (position). 


The uncertainty relation between these space-based and time-based parameters (crucially relying on Planck’s Constantmight not only establish limits to what we can know in a continuous classical sense (our subjectivities causally interacting with objects through what we perceive as the seamless restrictions of duration and distance) but correspond to connection possibilities with a necessary higher realm. In the “higher realm” the resistance of space and time against manifesting a medium that provides information to consciousness would essentially be null and exteriors “mental” objects would precisely correlate with our interior, subjective content.        


Dr. Gary E. Schwartz, PhD reports that using a sensitive single photon detector called the “Silicon Photo Multiplier System” that can detect photons in a pitch dark, cold ambient temperature, anomalous detection of an extra amount of photons repeatedly took place under controlled conditions after spirit collaborators were asked to produce the effect. When specific spirit collaborators are asked to manifest after baselines have been measured, the detector detects significantly more photon bursts during trial periods of 300 seconds. The device also measures photons during trials using experimenter’s intention, when no intention and when spirits are asked not to intervene. Then, photons remain at similar low levels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u7RqklxNnA 


It is time to stop ignorantly laughing at and dismissing serious results such as these. While I’m not an experimental scientist I think there’s enough reasonable evidence to take these and similar results in earnest. The implications are very important to modify what we think of ourselves and of “reality” especially in academic settings, to say the least.  


The consistent production of extra, “anomalous” photons when alleged discarnate spirits or consciousnesses are asked to affect the detection of photons by intention and under controlled conditions is in my view respectable, interesting evidence of survival of consciousness and personality after physical bodily death and studies like these need to be respectfully replicated  and improved. These “anomalies” aren’t just “irrelevant,” “weird” or “entertaining” phenomena of no real consequence. The nature of who we are, our post mortem state, and a more complete (and eventually practical) science and philosophy which may assist us in recreating our cultural parameters in more intelligent, informed ways is also involved.

 


Is the “anomalous” or “extra” production of stable photons (out of the zero-point vacuum or brought from elsewhere in space-time?) referred to by Dr. Gary Schwartz anteceded by a lowering of ambient temperature, even in the low temperature conditions apparently required to use the photon detector adequately? Does a more distant section of the laboratory experience a lowering of temperature? Does it have to do more with the discarnate’s capacity to manipulate virtual particle probabilities and quantum potentials at a particular zero-point energy level? While “anomalous” temperature differences may have nothing to do with the “anomalous” production of photons I think that we are allowed to speculate in a careful, yet informed way and to attempt to try to contribute an answer to the plausible mechanism involved, especially if most accredited scientists still prefer to shy away from these crucial “interdimensional” human survival issues.


“Ghost hunters” (I dislike this disrespectful entertainment-based term), or rather “ghost researchers” (a better term) and “ghost experiencers” in general have frequently reported conventionally unexplained drops in temperature before and during various discarnate spirit manifestations and many (including myself) have speculated that that phenomenon occurs when discarnate spirits are absorbing energy to be used later during the manifestations. Somehow, when the energy is released back into the physical environment (perhaps to produce a sound, briefly move an object, touch you, produce a certain visible opacity, an EVP (electronic voice phenomenon) or a seemingly intelligently travelling orb that can be filmed or so). The question is, what is the mechanism? Some of it may be deduced from what a lowering of temperature entails. It entails a decrease in kinetic activity, a decrease of agitation and motive force in physical molecules.


Perhaps the Peltier Effect can help us illustrate some ideas. 
Heat transfers in the direction of the charge carriers and the effect can be cooling or heating of the surrounding environment at the junctures between different conductors. 


If I understand it well, electrical current flowing from an iron conductor into a copper conductor (from less conductivity and more resistivity into more conductivity and less resistivity) “evolves” or emits thermal energy at the junction, also heating up the immediate environment surrounding that junction between these materials. Then, when the current leaves the copper conductor and flows back into the iron conductor (from more conductivity and less resistivity into less conductivity and more resistivity), this other junction cools down and with it also the immediate surrounding environment. If I’m not mistaken, in the former case, electrical energy would be lost as heat into the environment (increasing its entropy) and in the latter case electrical energy would be gained or absorbed from the environment (reducing its entropy). 


If I’m not mistaken, in the Peltier Effect, when electrons in a higher kinetic state passing through a “less dense,” less restricting conductor (like copper) connect with another “denser” conductor offering greater resistance (like iron), their kinetic state would diminish and cool down the juncture. Then again, we could perhaps say that, when electric current connects from a “denser,” more resistive medium (iron) into a “less dense,” less resistive medium (copper), it heats up by transferring kinetic energy into this juncture. Entropy-wise could we perhaps adequately compare the relation between the physical realm and the discarnate’s spirit realm with the relation between the “denser” and “less dense” wires in the Peltier electric circuit? 


The role of entropy (also linked to available information) would be crucial to tap into a causal and retrocausal interplay which also perhaps connects physicality with the discarnate spirit’s realm. Perhaps – when entropy decreases in the physical realm – physical kinetic energy states are transduced into useful organizing states in the discarnate’s spirit realm.   


I’d say that when temperature decreases in these processes, the potential energy increases. In other words, kinetic energy decreases, potential energy increases and temperature drops at the surrounding environment feeding energy back into the system with an interaction at the juncture. At the other juncture in the circuit kinetic energy is restored back and the overall entropy equilibrium is almost maintained within the circuit’s system (there are net losses to entropy in our perceived entropy-dominated universe because both conductors also heat up through Joule’s heating). While there’s an overall increase of entropy due to Joule’s heating, also around the juncture where the environment is cooled, that environment’s S (entropy) diminishes. More order and decipherable information patterns are established at the microscopic scale.


Measuring any anomalous drop or increase in temperature previous, during and after the photon detector trials (or other types of trials regarding experimental interactions with the discarnate spirit’s realm) may give us a measure of kinetic energy states converted into potential energy states within the physical realm while the kinetic states aspect may be transduced (and trans-ontologically transferred) into the discarnate’s spirit realm through a (usually non-consciously perceived) intermediate, retrocausal quantum link (allowed by positive and negative, dual solution, quantum relativistic equations incorporating special relativity and momentum). 


The kinetic activity transferred to the discarnate’s spiritual realm would be later on released into the physical realm reconverting a temporarily created potential state back into its original kinetic state while simultaneously generating detectable (quantum collapse) physical effects. The need to reestablish the original entropy balance that was disturbed in the physical realm would force this return to normalcy. There might also be a variable conversion factor (similar to what the uncertainty principle is for quantum mechanics) that allows temporary reconfigurations or interactions of this sort between the physical and the non-physical discarnate entities’ realm. 


That retrocausal link (perhaps also constitutive of what has elsewhere been called an “etheric” bridge between the physical realm and the discarnate entities “astral” spiritual realm) would change the effects of the kinetic force from being primarily entropy-increasing in the physical realm to being ‘momentarily’ (transtemporarily) re-organizing and useful to manifest patterns in the discarnate spirit’s realm own kind of exterior mental “substance.” The retrocausal link might turn potential states from one realm into actual and kinetic states in the other and vice versa. Any degree of inter-realm conversion might create an intermediate state and substance which corresponds to what some theosophists and spiritists call an “etheric” link between the physical and “astral” worlds. 


According to Dr. Ulisse di Corpo the retrocausality implied in unnecessarily rejected dual quantum-relativistic solutions may also serve to retrocausally (and syntropically) connect physical space-time existence with future quantum wave possibilities. Besides that – in my view – the retrocausal quantum waves might cancel out time-forward, causal, particulate, past-centered, “actual” physical experience, matter and entropy and -in the natural bridge formed – “transduce” and-or transfer potential and actual physical states into their corresponding opposite states in the null space and null time proper of the discarnate’s spiritual realm. 


The degree of cancellation between the time-forward and time-backward causal influences may correspond to a greater or lesser degree of superposition of physical space-time and the discarnate’s more inclusive, non-physical, null space-null time realm. If these superpositions can stabilize, they may generate different physical universes which may be more or less closer in nature to the essential characteristics of the discarnate’s, non-physical realm. In other words, some physical universes (all still ruled by the constraints of space-time and a dominant resistance of exterior matter to change at the macro level in order to acommodate to subjective experiences) may be “subtler” or “denser” so to speak. Some of these physical universes, with their own combinations of “constants” and other parameters such as entropy, inertia, and ‘initia’ (which could relate with the degree of quantum uncertainty and the associated capacity of consciousness to actualize potentials), might be the alternative “membranes” (or simply “branes”) floating in a higher dimensional space being considered along with theoretical developments in M Theory and cosmology.


Promoting the cancellation between the causal & retrocausal influences might be a way to infold our particularly (programmed?) physical space-time back into the realm of greater posibilities from which it sprung or unfolded. if we knew what promotes an deasier interaction with the discarnate spirits’ realm we would also probably learn to manipulate space-time without the need for extreme high energy physics. We might also be able to modify or reprogram the rate of time inasmuch as time can be considered as the numerical order of change (rate of events?) allowed per unit of space (read physicists Davide Fiscaletti and Amrit Sorli‘s works): A basic link is here: http://phys.org/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html


While causal solutions recognized in physics have been easy to intuitively accept as we consciously experience a time-foreward causality with an overall entropy increase and loss of useful information even if there are “islands” of greater organization, that include places like Planet Earth and living systems. However, backward-in-time, causally effective solutions appearing in the Klein-Gordon equations could also be non-trivial from a physical point of view. As Ulisse di Corpo explains, they may be experienced as probability waves which also are completely necessary for us to experience particulate matter in a linear and entropy-increasing sense. we need to outgrow our clasical, modern, biased resistance to the physics of the Kosmos. Presentiment experiments seem to demonstrate their reality and they seem to be necessary for the success of self-organizing, living entities embedded in physicality. Dr. Ulisse di Corpo and Dr. Antonella Vannini have written several articles and books on the subject from a scientific and from an experimental perspective. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDA836rOW00&feature=youtu.be 


That retrocausality with which we might normally interact in a subconscious manner (please review experiments by Dean Radin, Dick Bierman, Daryl Bem and others) may establish a quantum-level link that mediates between ontologically potential energy states of a distinct realm (in which space and time  are essentially superseded by an instant, information inclusive type of subjectivity-actualizing substance). The retrocausal influence normally related with future potentials would also naturally relate with the subtle (discarnate spirit realm) potentials that allow our physical world to manifest concrete expressions. 


The causal influence we sequentially experience normally relates with already-established actualizations or concrete events and particles. In other words, the (normally non-consciously perceived) quantum relativistic aspect might serve to turn what (from a physical perspective) are subtle level potentials into actualities in our physical world. It would perhaps serve to change physical kinetic states into potential states in the physical realm and to convert those physical potential states into useful kinetic states in the discarnate spirits’ subtle realm. No actual energy would be lost and-or transferred, only the actual and potential (and-or kinetic and potential) organizational STATES between the realms.

 

The temporary, anomalous borrowing of kinetic energy from the physical realm (and shift in entropy) might be allowed by a “conversion factor” between realms, perhaps akin to how the Heisenberg uncertainty permits a brief creation of virtual particles  (a short term borrowing of energy) before quickly dissappearing back into the zero-point, balancing out to maintain original baseline, average energy levels. 


The “conversion factor” of interaction between the discarnate spirit’s realm and the physical realm (our particular space-time physical sub realm) may be relatively stable but partially modifiable and depend on a difference between the rate of how consciousness instantaneously collapses a wave of probabilities restricted to conform to our coherent space-time physical world (probabilities also restricted by the need to maintain classical causal coherence on the aggregate) and how consciousness instantaneously ‘collapses’ broader experiential possibilities in the discarnate spirit’s realm, itself organized under a different principle and a greater degree of freedom, one in which exterior mental objects co-causally arise with interior, subjective experiences. In other words, in that realm, subjectivity would generate objects as much as objects would generate subjective responses on a co-equal basis. Perhaps in that more inclusive discarnate spirit’s realm containing all physical expression possibilities, the principle of initia is essentially co-equal with that of inertia.


While in the physical realm (and, to various degrees, its sub realms) the principle of inertia (exterior’s resistance to change) predominates over consciousness collapsing/actualizing possibilities under a specific, restricted range of probabilities and, while in the discarnate spirit’s realm (also, experientially, to various degrees according to its sub realms) the principle of inertia is essentially co-equal with consciousness collapsing/actualizing possibilities, in an even more inclusive “higher” realm of first principles and “seeds” (the causal realm in theosophy) the principle of inertia would be completely secondary and dependent on the principle of initia and on consciousness actualizing and collapsing possibilities. That’s why its exteriors would be emptiest of the illusion of independent existence and most inclusive of all that can be manifested. However, that’s a discussion for another – more metaphysical but scientifically relevant – article or essay.


Might the “anomalous” production of photons (out of the zero-point vacuum?) in Dr. Schwartz’s experiments be anteceded by a change of ambient temperature as has been the case in other research regarding discarnate spirit’s manifestations? It would be useful to try to measure any anomalous drop or increase in temperature previous, during and after the trials to obtain a measure of kinetic energy temporarily converted into potential energy while that kinetic activity aspect is perhaps transduced. We could also say that it is “trans-ontologically” transferred into the discarnate spirit realm’s unique type of material exteriors. Inasmuch as realms are in a potential state in relation to each other, they can be said to be in different ontological status. However there should also be interconectivity and interaction or exchange. The exteriors in the discarnate’s spirit realm would instantly respond to the discarnate spirit’s intention and its acquired-transduced patterns (now resonant with the physical realm) would be subsequently released back into the physical realm under the partial control of the discarnate entity’s intention, generating physical effects by taking advantage of the need to re-establish the original entropy.


An anomalous increase in temperature might be related (or not) to a simple restoration of the “sequestered” kinetic energy state without using that state to generate a specific movement, opacity, sound, or even production of photons out of the zero point energy field. 

 

The temporary, ‘anomalous’ borrowing of kinetic energy from the physical realm and shift in entropy transferring kinetic activity to the discarnate spirit’s realm might be allowed by a “conversion factor” akin to how the Heisenberg uncertainty allows a brief creation of virtual particles before returning the energies to the vacuum to maintain the original energy levels. This conversion factor of interaction between the discarnate’s realm and the physical realm may be variable and depend on the distinction between the rate of how consciousness instantaneously collapses a wave of restricted probabilities of experience in the physical world (restricted by the need to maintain classical causal coherence) and how consciousness instantaneously ‘collapses’ greater possibilities of experience in the discarnate spirit realm, itself organized with a greater degree of freedom and in which exterior mental objects are equally co-causal with interior, subjective experiences.

    

While in the physical realm at the quantum level intention and consciousness may collapse probability wave functions, overall macro exteriors seem to resist a dramatic change so as to maintain a classical coherence not responding instantaneously to subjective intention in an obvious, dramatic way. The rules, processes and even logic involved to maintain an experiential coherence resists those changes. However, according to a large body of information obtained through Instrumental Transcommunication, bona fide mediums, out of body experiencers, near death experiencers and apparitions, intention itself may generate a more dramatic instantaneous experience and actualization of exterior mental forms in the discarnate spirit’s realm and these forms may be regarded as causally co-equal with what these spirits subjectively experience. In other words, causality would not disappear but be organized under a different principle, pattern and logic; a type of causality in which exterior, objective, mental forms that can be collectively witnessed by other consciousnesses are causally CO-EQUAL with interior, subjective experiences. They would instantly feedback into each other.


The transferred kinetic energy in the discarnate spirit’s ‘material’ exteriors would obey the spirit’s intention to release that kinetic energy by manifest a physical effect that restores the original entropy and kinetic-potential balance back into the physical realm.

 

Note: 

 

We probably must eventually come to intelligently speculate, research, and explore the possibility of there being other substantially different forms of “matter” (physical space-time restricted, mental-subtle and primordial-causal) all representing their unique kinds of objective exteriors to subjective experiencers in a simultaneously arising and correlated way. This is how I interpret Ken Wilber’s quadrants of his Integral Theory. In any realm where some degree of duality exists and is experienced there would simultaneously arise subjective interiors and objective exteriors and at least three forms of “matter” would exist. Furthermore, we must remember that, besides subjectivity and objectivity, singleness/individuality and multiplicity/collectivity would also arise in each of the three main realms of existence. Moreover, each of these realms would simultaneously have a distinct, complementary and mutually immanent relation with each other; sometimes being interactive, mutually necessary in a potential-actual fashion and continuously interior to each other or included in each other. 

Comentario – Actitud Exopolítica – Comentario

Hay abundante evidencia que los ET existen, nos visitan y hasta cierto punto interactúan y, al empezar a entender quienes son, tendemos a usar ideas demasiado simplistas en pro y en contra respecto a ellos.

Respecto a los tipos de contactos, sus intenciones, naturalezas etc, muchas personas inclinadas a creer y avalar lo extraterrestre y paranormal y místico “angeliza” a ciertos seres ET y a veces les dan una autoridad cuasi infalible a sus respectivos contactados.

Necesitamos M+Á+S EQUILIBRIO por favor. Un punto de vista cada vez más obsoleto es decir que todas esas “son patrañas” o que, si nuestras referencias religiosas no los mencionan, Dios no ha creado a otros seres inteligentes…por lo tanto deben necesariamente ser demonios.

Así, el otro lado de la moneda es igual de limitante: DEMONIZAR a todos los ET o solo dar credibilidad a los casos que parecen presentar seres que manipulan y/ose comportan como los humanos lo harían de manera egoísta abusando de la tecnología para sus propios fines.

Hay de todo pero hasta los ET “negativos” seguirían reglas más avanzadas que lo dicho por nuestra política y entendimiento cotidiano.

Hay una cierta polarización en ovnilogía y exopolítica. ¿Crees en contactos si usan la palabra “espiritual” o si usan la palabra “Dios” y hasta la palabra “Jesus”? O por tu tendencia científica descartas inmediatamente casos que usan esas palabras y conceptos? ¿Acreditas solo los casos de abducción?

No es cuestión de solo acreditar o desacreditar a los casos con seres “benévolos” que dan mensajes de cambio y transformación espiritual y/o de “conciencia”. Tampoco es cuestión  de acreditar o desacreditar a los seres que abducen y hacen experimentos genéticos, aquellos casos que parecen ser suficientemente extraños usando tecnologías para manipularnos según sus fines o necesidades.

En ambos casos pueden ser “superiores” en algunos aspectos e “inferiores” a nosotros en otros aspectos  y no solo superiores en todo pero parece que el entendimiento físico-metafísico de la mayoría que puede llegar a nuestra realidad e interactuar de alguna manera es más holístico o integrador. Sus lógicas no son simples dicotomías con el medio excluido.

Tampoco son ángeles incorpóreos o espíritus puros benévolos o malévolos. Esos podrían ser propios de otra categoría de seres; de un mundo mental sin cuerpos físicos. Si los considerásemos “ángeles” tendría que ser bajo un concepto amplio que incluye a todos los mensajeros celestiales…hasta a los humanos. En ese caso habrían ángeles con cuerpo físico y sin cuerpo físico.

Proyectamos mucho de lo que somos o de lo que creemos en ambos casos. Los ET no lo deben todo a la tecnología o a capacidades de la conciencia. Cada caso es individual.  Cuando nos abrimos a la posibilidad de la real presencia ET tendemos a acreditar solo a un aspecto LIMITADO que nos place o gusta y con el que sentimos afinidad emocional personal o con quienes hayamos tenido alguna experiencia interactiva o evidencia.

Pero -si estudiamos con cuidado – veremos que el tema “ET” es mucho MÁS AMPLIO y que con un buen estómago hay que digerirlo todo para compaginarlo coherentemente. No es imposible hacerlo si ponemos la verdad por sobre nuestras preferencias personales. Según las evidencias históricas, de contacto en siete décadas o más, de documentos, de delatores gubernamentales, etc, hay MUCHAS formas y tipos de seres, de contactos y de interpretaciones personales más o menos correctas.

Pero aun así SÍ es posible tener un a idea global del asunto cuando comparamos tentativamente, sentimos, vivenciamos y analizamos TODA la información disponible sin limitarnos a un aspecto. Hay que hacer el esfuerzo para incrementar nuestra “aptitud exopolítica” ya que gradualmente se abren los caminos para el ciudadano MÁS INFORMADO hacia decidir cómo relacionarnos sanamente con esta realidad.

Por eso no solo debemos interesarnos en lo negativo y escabroso por morbosidad como tampoco en lo excesivamente “maravilloso”. Es mejor no dejarnos deslumbrar por lo emocional sea de carácter negativo como positivo (¡Oh qué horrible! ¡Oh qué maravilloso!). Aunque algunos podrían comportarse más angelicalmente y otros más endemoniadamente, no serían ni ángeles ni demonios en el sentido clásico de esos términos.

Ni demonizar a los ET con los cuales (cuando no…”para variar” ) ha que batallar, ni pensar en ellos como “ángeles puros” o seres casi espiritualmente perfectos que nos ayudarán a “ascender” a un mundo ideal. Ni sentirnos dependientes de ellos, ni superiores ni inferiores sino que cada cual desde su realidad con logros y defectos. No buscarlos para obtener poder por medio de sus tecnologías sino conocimientos más profundos que nos ayuden a no perdernos aún más en la ilusión material y tecnológica que nos encandila; principios por los cuales todos los aspectos del Cosmos se pueden integrar utilizando sanamente cualquier nivel tecnológico.

La realidad es que tendremos que trabajar seriamente para entender este tema extraterrestre que conlleva grandes implicancias y responsabilidades políticas, culturales, religiosas, epistemológicas, etcétera. En poco tiempo, décadas, días , horas o años el tema podría ser admitido oficialmente y algunos de los excesivamente escépticos dirán que lo sabían desde siempre. Otros se abrirán a considerar esto en serio por primera vez puesto que necesitaban la admisión oficial para permitirse pensar en ello. Unos condenarán, otros exacerbarán lo fantástico y la sumisión a “seres superiores”.

Algunos buscarán posicionarse para obtener ventajas personales pero creo que para la mayoría  lo normal y el día a día continuarán, cambiando gradualmente a medida que los líderes y la colectividad tomen conciencia que lo que creían no era exactamente como pensaban. Si hasta ahora los ET (de distintas alianzas, confederaciones, intenciones, orígenes) casi se han mantenido al margen de interactuar abiertamente con nuestras sociedades estimo que después de una revelación oficial ampliamente creíble no van tampoco a mostrarse de forma demasiado contundente.

Las respuestas humanas serán muchas y se abrirán nuevos retos para descubrir quienes somo y colectivamente cambiar nuestra forma de ser en el planeta. Cómo interactuar con mutuo respeto y qué leyes crear (o reconocer) serán temas necesarios para una más amplia actitud exopolítica.

Peruvian Invented Liquid Fuel Rocket Engine & Spacecraft between 1895-1902

PEDRO PAULET MOSTAJO’s “auto bolide” or “torpedo plane” was designed to house 36 liquid-fueled rockets in each pivoting delta-shaped wing. It was particularly designed to fly under astronautical conditions and also under aeronautical ones.

The device had a central, hermetically sealed sphere and the pivoting delta wing. The unique device  was supposed to take off vertically and then (by moving the delta wings) to fly horizontally.

The design for this astronautical craft dates at least as far back as 1902. Probably the device was intended to be used aeronautically in the atmosphere but, quite likely, during an emerging period of interest  in rocketry, Paulet realized that its characteristics made it useful to space flight.

Paulet believed that liquid rockets would allow this craftto go into space. He invented the bi-propellant (liquid fuel & oxidizer) rocket motor that was later used by other scientists that became more notorious. I believe his invention used nitrogen peroxide and gasoline performing with 300 explosions per minute.

Paulet was a chemical engineer that wanted to develop a space craft that could go into space. The crew cabin for 4 persons was designed inside as a relatively comfortable hermetically sealed sphere.

Before inventing the “auto bolide” (and after studying how squids propelled themselves) Paulet had invented the “Girandola” or rocket-propelled wheel in which rockets were cyclically ignited each time they passed under a fuel distributor. Listening to the expertise of Alvaro Mejía (expert on Pedro Paulet and member of the Institute of Aerospace Historical Studies of Peru) I’ll say that it was an industrial motor and not a turbine.

Of humble origins, Paulet was born in Tiabayo, Arequipa, Peru in 1874 and, after experimenting with small rockets with solid propellants as a boy and adolescent, it is beliebed that he got a government grant and studied chemical engineering at Sorbonne University in Paris befriending scientist Pierre Curie.

After experimenting with solid propellants he tried Panclastite (suffering an explosion for which he was temporarily arrested and became partly deaf). Pedro Paulet’s liquid fuel rocket designs (between 1895-1900) were practical and done before Robert Goddard.  He should have been recognized by them but did not patent them or was able to build a rocket due to lack of financial resources. However, the diagrams existed and he worked in the lab.

Space flight and rocketry pioneers Robert H. Goddard and Herman Oberth were inspired by the work of Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. While Tsiolkovsky wrote in1903 “The Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction Devices” as the first treatise describing the use of liquid fuel and the principle of action-reaction to build rocket capable of going into space, this idea had already been(experimentally and in design-concept) explored by Paulet.

Paulet’s “auto-bolide” was meant to travel in the atmosphere, in space and even under water. For being designed in 1902 or earlier it looks quite advanced, almost like an advanced craft (like other delta wings) stemming out of Area 51.

It is said that in the 1920’s car maker Henry Ford offered Paulet a large sum of money to designed a rocket for car racing but that he declined telling him that his invention was meant to reach the Moon. According to Paulet expert Álvaro Mejía there’s no proof of it.  However, there are hints that the German Astronautical Society and Paulet knew each other. Perhaps Paulet was asked to work with German scientists to build military rockets but, since he wanted his inventions to be for peaceful purposes, he declined.

Paulet sought investors to finance the construction of his “auto bolide” or “torpedo plane” but -while he attracted some interest – in the end could not find them, especially after he was appointed by the Government of Peru for ambassadorial duties to Belgium, Japan and Argentina. Paulet didn’t call much attention to himself and other inventors counting with more resources to build rockets received more recognition later on. His claims of inventing the bi-propellant rocket became publicly known when he wrote to the newspaper El Comercio in 1927.

According to several sources Werner von Braun (German rocket pioneer and chief NASA scientist) wrote (in his book World History of Astronautics): “Pedro Paulet was in Paris in those years (1900), experimenting with his tiny two-and-a-half kilogram motor, and achieved 100 kg of force. By this act, Paulet should be considered the pioneer of the liquid fuel propulsion motor.” (“World History of Aeronautics” by Werner von Braun & Fred Ordway).

While several sources cite Von Braun as I’m quoting him above, I’m trying to find an early copy of Von Braun’s “World History of Aeronautics” to verify the exact words he used about Paulet.

As Mr. Álvaro Mejía  mentions, later on Ordway denied Paulet’s merit probably as  a geopolitical strategy to place Goddard above the Germans and Russians. Mr. Mejía reminds us that Paulet’s conceptual claims became known before Goddard’s and that Ordway mainly focuses on the fact that Paulet didn’t patent his invention while forgetting that his concept was earlier.

* Many thanks to Mr. Álvaro Mejía for kindly sending me some corrections to what I had published earlier.

Engineer Pedro Paulet Mostajo

pedro-paulet

 

An exterior reproduction of the “torpedo plane” or “auto bolide” as seen in the Peruvian Aeronautical Museum

Pedro Paulet Avion torpedo

1897 Liquid fuel rocket prototype by Pedro Paulet.  It was the precursor of the system that led humanity into spaceflight

PAULET(06)-MotorReacc

Sources:

Mejía, Álvaro. (17/02/2008). “Paulet: El Pionero”. La República.  http://www.larepublica.pe/17-02-2008/paulet-el-pionero

Mejía, Álvaro (25/04/2010) “Pedro Paulet: Peruvian Pioneer of the Space Age” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics http://enu.kz/repository/2010/AIAA-2010-2217.pdf

Mejía, Álvaro. (23/01/2011). “1969: El Año de Paulet”. Clío: Historia y Actualidad del Perú y del Mundo. http://clioperu.blogspot.com/2011/01/pedro-paulet-y-el-origen-de-los-cohetes.html

Mejía, Álvaro. (05/05/2014) “Un Asteroide Llamado Paulet” Caretas. http://www.caretas.com.pe/Main.asp?T=3082&id=12&idE=1071&idA=61297#.U2hHqfl5MSY

Madueño Paulet de Vásquez, Sara. «Pedro Paulet: Peruvian Space and Rocket Pioneer » . 21st Century Science & Technology Magazine. http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/winter01/paulet.html

Machado, Ramón. 03/07/2011 “Pionero del Cohete Espacial y Misil es Peruano P. Paulet”.  Cronica Viva. http://www.cronicaviva.com.pe/index.php/ciencia-y-tecnologia/tecnologia/23012-pionero-del-cohete-espacial-y-el-misil-es-peruano-ppaulet

Villareal, Alonso. “Monografía de Pedro Paulet” http://alonso-villareal.blogspot.com/2012/08/monografia-de-pedro-paulet.html

Wikipedia. “Pedro Paulet”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_Paulet#cite_ref-autogenerated1_3-1

Toward an Extraterrestrial Science: Deeper Into the “Etherian” Concept

What are some of the basics behind the different kinds of ET craft that seem to come in and out of our physical reality frame, to counteract gravity and inertia, to create MACRO QUANTUM effects and so on? All ET may have to behave according to some rules and most seem to be respectful toward us. Perhaps a minimum degree of a more ORGANIC consciousness would be necessary to be allowed to operate on Earth (and inside) whether positively or negatively inclined.  That consciousness would go hand in hand with a science that probably makes use of a realm that transcends and includes what we normally experience as the “Physical Realm.”  

To understand who is positive and in service to others or negative or service to self would be innacurate based on the more dichotomous judgment standards we employ along with a common sense and science based on our classical physical experience. We would need to beging to understand retrocausality applicable to the Physical Realm but ultimately stemming (along with regular time-forward causality) from a higher non physical symmetry.

 

 

However (as a brief comment diverging a little from the main theme of this article) I think that there should be much more recognition of benevolent extraterrestrial groups, similar in typology to Earth humans. By “benevolent” I mean respectful of consious free will choice and not only of subconsious free will. Also respectful of a preparation for contact process.   In spite of the interest in abductions (whether Et or human made) and a sense of reality that only validates an “us vs. them” mentality) these friendlier, conversant, respectful contacts (which have been ridiculed and misunderstood) are also real and would be highly beneficent for humanity helping us to (re) insert ourselves into a vast cosmic community; a vast galactic “family.”

 

 

Those ETs of similar typology and human demeanor,  character and ‘feel’ may be for us (at this point in our individual-collective awareness) easier to contact as was the case of the 1950’s contacts. However, not all ‘space brothers’ need to be “Nordic” as mindlessly repeated in some places and eventually not all of them need to be human. And -while still benevolent and quite sufficiently human-looking – not all of them need be as easy to relate with psychologically as the kind space ‘friends’ George Adamski met. But that’s another theme. However, don’t miss it:  Carefully check out www.adamskifoundation.com and check out Steckling video interviews like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z39tL4m6Vm4

 

Now, regarding the “Ethereans” (Etherean ETs) sometimes referred to in (non classical physics “nuts & bolts” limited UFO literature): This should be clarified to get a more scientific idea of it so that people may not think that space brothers (blond human shaped or not) is not a wishful thinking situation: Thinking about “ethereans” for some years I think that various rates of physical density (degrees of limitation into time forward space time experience) exist as the larger Physical Realm (a realm predominantly organized according to specific space time principles, material causality and its logic) interacts (in corresponding various degrees) with the Subtle Realm (also organized under space and time inclusive principles, another form of material causality and logic). In the Subtle Realm interiors (subjectivities) and exteriors (limiting material correlates to experience) would be causally co-equal and posses another form of substance; a space and time transcending and including “mental substance” (some of its sublevels are called the ‘astral subplanes’).

 

 

 

The nexi or intermediate combinations between the space time exteriorly experientially expressed Physical Realm and the null space time exteriorly expressed Subtle Realm is what we may call or experience as the “physical” etheric planes. They are stable intermediate states that retransmit the vivification of experiential menaing from the Subtle Realm into the Physical. They are actual but only perceived as potential from our ordinary causally time-forward, conscious experience. However, these intermediate “etheric” states transduce the retrocausal aspects (transcended and included under a higher metaphysical symmetry in the Subtle Realm). These retrocausal aspects are needed to materialize physical substance under space time parameters. They are expected under some quantum mechanical solutions that incorporate Einstein’s relativity (like the Klein-Gordon solution to Einstein’s original equation which in itself included physical momentum under a square root that gave a positive time-forward causal result and  time-backward causal solution). http://www.sintropia.it/thesis.pdf

 

 

The internal non-local holographic universe would originate in a Subtle Realm state prior to an experiential subdivision of time-forward and time-backwards complementary causalities. Also, inasmuch as the time-forward and time-backward physically relevant causalities cancel each other, we experience a partial return to the Subtle Realm state from which physical experience and the Physical Realm stem from.   Both degree of duality experience (and experiential decoding/interpretation (or epistemology) and exterior reality (ontology) co-exist inextricably. Only pure, non-dual “Consciousness” includes them both (and is not limited to subjectivity and epistemology).

 

 

The ETs are of the Physical Realm which is subdivided into various “densities” and rates of vibration according to how it stably relates with the Subtle Realm. Many ETs (while still physical and within space time exterior material causal predominance, thus still needing physical technology) originate in less “dense” alternative stable physical sub realms, with less inertia, entropy and other space time dependent physical parameters. The subtler (or more connected with the Subtle Realm) a physical reality is, the more negentropy, syntropy or self-organizing (converging) tendencies are experienced in a conscious manner from what could be today understood as “quantum potential retrocausal influences.”

 

We may perceive almost as spiritual forms and-or as luminous forms (from our ‘denser’ perspective) some of the less physically dense ETs (beyond what’s been termed “4th density” which still experience 3 Space directions of ‘distance’+ 1 Time rate of experience combining time-forward and time-backward to various degrees for the conscious mind). These can more easily be called “ethereans” specially from our less etheran perspective as some early contactees and researchers (Mead Lane comes to mind) did. However, we would also be “ethereans” to a lesser degree that normally limits us experientially to a linear (time-forward related) causality, greater exterior inertia (and less of its opposite “initia”) and so forth.  However, as said, even if the more etheran ETs can make more conscious and psychic use of Subtle Realm causality through a more conscious mental aactualization/manipulation of (normally subsconsciously experienced) retrocausal physical aspects, they are not purely Subtle or discarnate beings.

 

A double tetrahedron includes the descending and ascending, the coding and decoding, the wave and particle aspects, the cancelation of forces in equilibrium that can be fractalized to maintain a non local connection at all scales. The forms that result can spin or rotate combining stability and change or flow (study Nassim Haramein’s findings).

Advanced and Retarded waves (necessary in valid interpretations of quantum mechanics, even in quantum relativistic solutions) would split from a higher symmetry order in the Subtle Realm (transcending and including space time). Less dense physical universes would express more retrocausal effects and in this way their (still physical) substance would be more responsive to quantum actualizing thought and consciousness.

The torus and and previous ideas above would all represent different ways of the relation of the Physical Realm to the Subtle realm as part and whole aspects (of every ‘holon’ or subjective-objective manifestation) can interconnect at various stable scales. The infinitely small center of the torus would represent the connection with the non-physical Subtle Realm…a higher level of meaning for consciousness to potentially experience and a non-local realm in which a different expression of matter responds to and interacts with subjectivity in equal measure co-causally.